Radiación EMF. Todo la Verdad bien explicada.

EMF Radiation. The Truth Explained.

September 8, 2024

Definition

Electromagnetic radiation is produced by the variation of current in a conductor, which in turn produces an oscillating electric and magnetic field, propagating in any medium. It is often referred to as EMF, which stands for "Electromagnetic Field."

EMF includes radio waves, microwaves, infrared light, visible light, ultraviolet light, X-rays, gamma rays, etc.

Types of radiation

Depending on the oscillation frequency of the electromagnetic field (the number of times it changes polarity and/or value per second), EMF radiation is classified into two large groups: Ionizing Radiation and Non-Ionizing Radiation .

From the perspective of official science, understood as a dogmatic and imposed institution unsupported by evidence or independent studies, it is asserted that ionizing radiation has the ability to strip electrons from atoms, including those in our DNA and cells, which has led to recognition of the damage it causes. This category includes, among others, X-ray and gamma radiation.

However, even in the current year in which I write these lines (2025), both in the field of medicine and in other institutional scientific sectors, students, future doctors and professionals continue to be "taught" that "non-ionizing radiation does not have enough energy to remove electrons, neither from cells nor from DNA, and therefore, it does not cause harm."

In my case, with a background in Industrial Engineering and a specialization in Electronics, I have observed that these programs fail to address or even mention the dangers of non-ionizing radiation, despite abundant evidence and studies showing that the greater the exposure, both in intensity and frequency, the greater the negative impact on health. This harm is observable, demonstrable, and repeatable, thus complying with the principles of the scientific method.

However, this isn't true. The damage depends on the frequency, exposure time, and power. Even with clearly non-ionizing frequencies (2.4 GHz), we find confirmed deaths and clinical studies demonstrating the damage they cause, as we'll see below.

Beginning, radio with Marconi and evolution to the present day

In 1887 Marconi invented the radio

Today in Spain alone, officially recognized, there are only more than 1000 telephone lines.

Let's remember that we are electrical beings. Our cells, heart, brain, nervous system... all function through electrical impulses.
In fact, Willem Einthoven invented the electrocardiogram in 1887 as early as the 19th century, and 37 years later, Hans Berger invented the electroencephalogram. Both tests are widely used today to measure the electrical impulses of the heart and brain, respectively.

Confirmed deaths

An example is the case of Samuel Yannon, who died in 1974. His death was officially recognized by the United States government as a result of damage caused by exposure to microwaves in his workplace.

Samuel Yannon was a telephone technician, and shortly after starting work, he experienced health problems. He was concerned that the cause might be the environment in which he worked, with its high levels of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation.

As he continued to be exposed to this damage, his condition worsened: he lost vision and hearing, became prematurely senile, and finally lost half his weight until his death.

The courts agreed that the microwave environment was the cause of Samuel Yannon's death, and awarded his widow a modest cash settlement.

Recall that, in 1974, the United States had no laws limiting the power of electromagnetic radiation, even in workplaces or residential settings. However, the Soviet Union, even then, required that microwave energy not exceed ten microwatts per square centimeter in the ordinary workplace.

This case highlighted the health risks and damage in environments with exposure to non-ionizing radiation.

There are several reported cases of deaths from putting one's head in a microwave.
The media, institutions, and health professionals have conveyed the idea that these appliances are safe and that non-ionizing radiation does not pose a significant health risk. Although irrational for most, some people have come to completely trust this official information, to the point of using a microwave as a substitute for a hair dryer when it was damaged.
Despite the brief exposure, the high levels of radiation caused internal bleeding that resulted in death hours later.

It was due to cases like these and the risks associated with direct exposure to microwaves that safety mechanisms were required in microwave ovens. These devices must have a system that prevents them from operating unless the door is completely closed, ensuring that no microwaves are released during use.

As an example in the European Union, this type of regulation is covered under the Electromagnetic Compatibility Directive (2014/30/EU).

General use frequency (formerly military frequencies)

In addition to being electrical beings, we are mostly composed of 70% structured water .

The resonant frequency of water (at least in terms of its greatest efficiency at absorbing radiation) is 2.4 GHz . This is why it's the ideal frequency for microwaves to use for "heating" food.
For this reason, it was primarily a military frequency until it was enabled for civilian use in 1985 , changing the regulation of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United States.

This change resulted in the previously military 2.4 GHz band being the only one enabled for civilian use for industrial applications , which gave rise to its use in technologies such as Wi - Fi , Bluetooth devices, home microwaves and other wireless systems .

On the other hand, the 26 GHz band has a high affinity for oxygen , and produces a reduction in oxygen absorption and saturation levels in living beings exposed to this frequency. "Coincidentally," this band is used in the highest frequency of the 5G telephony generation and also in all the radars incorporated in modern cars called ADAS (advanced driver assistance systems).

Now we know that our smartwatch, our wireless headphones, our car hands-free kit, our wireless mouse, our Wi-Fi, and virtually all wireless devices use this military-grade 2.4 GHz frequency, which is the same frequency used by microwave ovens.

The question then is, is it dangerous? We'll answer that in the next point.

Is it dangerous or harmful, and it depends on what?

The damage caused by electromagnetic radiation depends mainly on 3 factors: Power , Exposure time and Frequency .

Due to so much misinformation on this point, despite the studies, some of which are decades old, and the symptoms of diseases, inflammation, reduced blood flow, oxidative stress, acidification, tinnitus, heart problems (interaction with the signals that control the heart), etc., the prevailing dogmatism tries to deny it, so we are going to give very basic, visual examples that anyone can verify (we are not responsible for any damage or experiments carried out, since as I write and reiterate here, these fields are very harmful at high power and/or prolonged exposure times).

Power
The damage caused is proportional to the power received .
In turn, the power received is the result of the power emitted over distances exponentially. Measurements show that the power received drops by 1/10 (one tenth) as the distance increases twice . This is key to protecting ourselves, since moving four times as far away from the EMF source results in about 100 times less power received.

Exposure time

The damage caused is proportional to the time we're exposed . So, for example, even if we put our head in a microwave oven at full power for just 0.1 seconds, and that were all the electromagnetic radiation we'd receive in our lifetime, it wouldn't be a problem at all. At the same power, if we changed the time to 8 hours, we'd obviously have transcended.

These are the two most important parameters: the power we receive and the time during which we receive it.

Frequency

For the same received power value and exposure time, generally speaking, the higher the frequency, the greater the damage. Particularly damaging are the 2.4 GHz frequencies (high affinity for water) and 26 GHz frequencies (high affinity for oxygen and difficulty in oxygen absorption by living beings exposed to this frequency).

EMF Sources and Solutions for Each

The best solution is to avoid the problem. No solution is better than eliminating the source that creates it. Just as a helmet protects against impacts, the best way to avoid damage is to not get hit in the first place. It's not a long-term solution to talk on your cell phone glued to your brain for eight hours a day and think that having an Electronite nearby or grounding yourself has solved the problem 100%. Therefore, we're going to create two distinct groups: those EMFs we can control and those we can't , to find the best solutions for each:

Radiations that depend on us :
Mobile phones (3G band up to 5G band, frequencies from 0.7 GHz to 26 GHz)
Mobile chargers
Bluetooth helmets ( 2.4 Ghz )
Smartwatch ( 2.4 Ghz )
Wireless mouse and keyboards ( 2.4 Ghz )
Modern car radars: Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) ( 26 GHz )

The solution for this type of problem is first to eliminate the source and second, if it is not possible, to protect ourselves with technology that neutralizes, reduces or transforms it into a positive source or to move away from it.

Radiation that does not depend on us (directly): Meteorological radars, telecommunications, radio waves, military frequencies and antennas, Telephone Antennas (mainly 3G, 4G, 5G and 6G generations), Satellite antennas (Starlink for example).

The solution for this type is to protect ourselves with technology that either shields it, transforms it, neutralizes it, or reduces it.